In Depth Narration and How it Enhances Characters / Settings

This week’s blog post takes a deeper look into pages 30-66 in Toni Morrison’s “Sula”. Up to this point of the reading we have been able to learn a little bit about each character and have been able to see a few different interactions between everyone. Something that has really stood out so far is the in depth narration and description of different scenes and characters throughout. It has pretty much come natural to this point of the book how easy it is to paint that picture of what is going on. We’re able to do this because of the descriptive words, and in depth character analysis of certain settings and situations. Many books out there have a movie that goes along with them and it is always interesting to see how the characters interact with one another along with scene development. Right now this story does not need that because of how in depth and easy it is to picture each character and setting. Think back to earlier in the semester when we were reading “A Raisin In The Sun” by Lorraine Hansberry. The book was great and had amazing character / story development but lacked that ability to paint a picture in the reader’s mind for what their situation looked like. When I’m reading Sula I have these thoughts and images constantly running through my head about how it looks because of the constant use of descriptive words and imagery. 

 

We’re at a point in the book where we are slowly learning about who the main characters are like Sula, Eva, Boyboy, and more. Toni Morrison does such a good job describing situations and characteristics. She does this by using certain words and phrases that give the reader an idea of what is really going on in the scene. Off rip Morrison immediately starts talking about Sula’s house stating “The creator and sovereign of this enormous house with the four seckel-pear trees in the front yard and the single elm in the back yard was Eva Peace, who sat in a wagon on the third floor directing the lives of her children, friends, strays, and a constant stream of borders” (Sula, p. 30).  While this isn’t a crucial part of the chapter it gives us readers the basics of some of the characteristics of a pretty important setting along with using descriptive vocab like “enormous” and painting us a picture of what Eva was doing in the front yard. Moving to another example of in depth narration would be when stated “Quickly, as the whoosh of flames engulfed him, she shut the door and made her slow and painful journey back to the top of the house” (Sula, p. 48). This scene is quite eventful as it talks about Eva intentionally setting a fire. Morrison again does a great job of using descriptive words like “engulfed”, this gives us readers a picture of what that may have looked like as Eva made her escape out of the room. The description of a character can be huge for a story’s overall progression because you get to learn and understand a little more about who they are and how their role impacts the progression of the story. Throughout this story we see so many descriptions of physical and characteristic traits that give us a deeper understanding of the book. To start off we are talking about Eva’s last child Plum, and what he was like after returning from war. It is about how he had sent letters talking about coming home soon but was unable to. A quote that really stood out was “Finally some two or three days after Christmas, he arrived with just the shadow of his old dip-down walk. His hair had been neither cut nor combed in months, his clothes were pointless and he had no socks. But he did have a black bag, a paper sack, and a sweet, sweet smile” (Sula, p. 45). This was a textbook character description from Morrison and it helped me understand much more that emotion all the characters had in that scene. Everyone was happy to see him and welcomed him home. As the reader we can see what that room looks like when he walks in, a worn out man in rough shape coming back from the war just happy he could see his family more than anything. This is what has shown all across this book so far, super in depth descriptions of characteristics and scenes.

 

Overall Toni Morrison has made it a great read and pleasant experience as a reader being able to analyze her scenes and characters. I wouldn’t say it is a pattern but most definitely a common theme throughout the book being able to analyze and see what kind of the person the main characters are and paint that image in your head about where they physically are in the book. 

 

Discussion Questions: 

  1. Has Toni Morrison’s use of descriptive words helped deepen your understanding for what is going on in the book so far? Explain.
  2. As a reader is it easier for you to take in information from a book when you’re able to paint that imaginary picture in your head of the setting, characters, etc?

 

Works Cited:

  • (Morrison, T. (1998). Sula)

Jack Falvo – Spike Lee Event

On February 14th of this year I had the privilege to attend an event held by Christopher Ortega talking about the life of Spike Lee and how significant he is in not only the film world but more importantly the black community. Coming into this event I was pretty excited because I am pretty familiar with Spike Lee but wanted to know more about his importance within the black community. I also remember watching his popular movie from 1989 titled “Do The Right Thing”. I was pleasantly surprised when the event started and this was the main subject of what we were going to be talking about for the day. The movie takes place in Brooklyn, New York where there is racial tension between the surrounding African American community and a local Italian American pizzeria. The events between the groups end up leading to a tragic violence. 

 

While this film shows the events that take place with racial hostility the overall message it is trying to get across is to challenge the continuous racial stereotypes black people face in their day to day life. It addresses the controversial subject overall of racism and the real life problems that are going on to this day. Spike Lee was known for being able to leave this lasting thought and have you thinking about what you just saw within his films. The main dispute in this film is how there should be African Americans on the wall of fame in the pizzeria because of the community it is located in. While this may not seem like a major dispute that should result in anything serious it was a conflict between both characters. This leaves us viewers wondering about not only the conflict but the deeper root behind it. That rooting being race, this is what Spike Lee wants you to question. By doing this Spike Lee is known for opening up that introduction of race inequality to the American film scene. 

 

I came into Ortega’s presentation and event about Spike Lee knowing only a small amount of his career. I only knew him as the guy from “Do The Right Thing” and the die hard New York Knicks fan. I learned that he was a pioneer for the filmmaking industry and the black community as a whole. He pushed the envelope for the modern day American media to have those uncomfortable thoughts and really think about the mistreatment of black people in the world. And while things like violence, mistreatment, and racism still go on to this day you can’t help but appreciate what people like Spike Lee have done for not just African Americans but the human race as a whole. Although this was a black history month event people like him should be and are celebrated year round for not only what they did for their respective industries but for what they more importantly do for the communities they are proudly a part of.

Introduction

How’s it going everyone my name is Jack Falvo and I’m from Hartford, CT. I’m a transfer student at Cortland and i’m looking forward to this upcoming semester.  In my free time I enjoy going to gym and hanging out with friends.

css.php