Overpoliced & Underprotected:

         Within the event I attended Black History month which was hosted by the head of the sociology department Dr. Marcus Bell, we discussed certain issues within and outside the police system. To start off the meeting off Dr. Bell gave a few personal stories where he was victimized at a young age for the color of his skin. When one incident was him walking to the store with his older brother and another black man ran up on them and robbed them at gunpoint, he was only a child at the time and this was not his only incident. Another time he was on his way to football practice with a  few of his brothers and one of them had a cap gun (which are fake), the bus driver called the police and next thing they knew he and his brothers were all at gunpoint.  These two incidents show a very good representation of what Dr. Bell means by overpoliced, did the police think twice or did they only see the color of their skin? There comes a line where policing is protecting the good from the bad, but here are times where police protect partially all of society although from a racial bias they lead their decisions with. The overlying issue is that police are protecting people from what their beliefs contain. Another takeaway from Dr. Bell’s discussion was the fact that children should not have to live in these atmospheres where they are walking home, or on the bus going to football practice and lives are immediately on the line. They should be able to live within a protected safe atmosphere and have a comforting trust that the police are not there to cause harm. 

            To further add onto this, under protected areas are at a greater risk for crime whether it is interracial or not. Inter racial crime is often demonized which then puts a label on one whole race. We discussed the inter racial crime rates and how the “ghetto” was created by the government as a place for low income housing, this was then labeled as “black neighborhoods” which then developed into “the ghetto”, this entire process includes demonizing a race. If the ghettos are such a high crime rate area, why doesn’t the government do more to try and help protect/ keep these areas safe? One issue as to why this can be difficult is because many do not trust or like the police due to issues from their past, social class, beliefs. etc. This can be due to how society focuses mostly on police murders and when they kill someone unarmed. If society focuses on killings we normalize it and it is not good between community and law enforcement. Although the actual killing may be rare, the violence police choose to use against black minorities is daily. Whether it is hitting them when they are already in cuffs or hitting their head while putting them in the back of a cop car. It is the little things that go unnoticed by those it does not occur to. Although policing is nowhere near considered an easy job, we further discussed how police officers go out to work everyday not knowing if they will make it home. Not all of law enforcement should be labeled for the bad actions of certain officers. Although those officers should be held accountable for the horrible things they have done.

          Overall the meeting outlined certain issues within and outside of law enforcement and the defying reasoning as to why our society is overpoliced and underprotected when it comes to those of African American descent. This will continue to be an ongoing fight but when will justice be served?



Mama’s Character Interpretation; An evaluation of Mama’s character after watching “A Raisin in the Sun” play, as compared to reading it.

         I think that the film (although obviously correlating with the reading) gives us as the watchers a new interpretation of the characters and certain scenes within the play. It is easy to read a novel or play and draw out the characters, connections, and interactions within our mind, although our ideas may alter after seeing the play performed. We are able to interpret different crucial values of the play “A Raisin in the Sun” by Lorraine Hansberry, and the raw outline of the “American Dream” and what that looks like for this particular family within the play. The first altered feature I noticed was the setting. Personally, when I read plays, or novels, I try to paint an imagine in my head as I read, the setting within my mind while reading differed extremely from the setting within the play, I pictured the house, jobs, and living style very differently throughout reading the play, and seeing their living situation visually alters how urgent and necessary I think their move was. 

          Although the setting was altered for me after watching the play, there were also many crucial points within the movie that changed the traits of characters, or were illustrated differently within the reading of the play and watching it. I think that one scene that was viewed differently between reading and watching the play was when Benetha went on her tangent about how God should not deserve all the credit and Mama was shocked by what she was saying and slapped her across the face. Within the novel this scene is described as “ It’s just that I get tired of Him getting credit for all the things the human race achieves through its own stubborn effort. There simply is no blasted God– there is only man and it is he who makes miracles! (Mama absorbs this speech, studies her daughter and rises slowly and across to Benetha and slaps her powerfully across the face. After, there is only silence and the daughter drops her eyes from her mother’s face, and Mama is very tall before her) (51.) Within the play we can see how Beneatha was voicing her opinion within the walls of Mama’s house and within her words she offended Mama strongly and was punished for whom she was speaking to. Although it is described powerfully within the novel and you are moved as the reader and driven into the weakness Benetha felt, and the power/anger Mama felt about the topic of discussion, I interpreted it differently after watching it. For starters, Benetha talking about God and saying how she does not believe in his aspects, she was more trying to voice her opinion within a safe area and caught Mama at a time of high emotion due to the discussion her and Ruth were having prior about the house they currently live in and her late husband big Water. It is said within the stage directions that after Mama slaps Benetha she exits the room, although after watching the play, it is seen that Mama simply just walks away and continues with what she was doing and Benetha’s eyes filled with tears and she was the one to run off set. This made me interpret the scene differently, because when I was reading these few moments I thought that Benetha was in such a moment of anger and annoyance that she almost meant to hurt Mama with her words by reflecting off her own emotions, though, I believe that it is the other way around. I think that Mama was feeling distraught and conflicted with what to do with the money coming and there were high emotions with missing her husband. This caused Mama to act harshly as more and more began to add to her list of worries about life in general. To conclude my interpretation of this scene, I believe that with Mama not walking out of frame and leaving the discussion it showed her more powerful side, as we all know she is head of the household, but after seeing her almost carelessness from slapping Beneatha to just going back to what she was doing, shows that she knows how much power she truly holds. Her beliefs are to be respected and not altered or speaked down upon, and with Beneatha’s opinions overflowing the room Mama put her power to use and with Benetha fleeing the scene, I think it shows how off guard she was taken by the slap and how unsure she was about how to act. 

       There were multiple scenes that I viewed differently after watching the play as compared to reading it. I believe that audiences reading or watching the play will gather different emotions, characteristics of character, setting description, and stage direction/ emotion very differently. Although the changes may not be major while watching the play, they were harsh enough to alter my interpretation of certain aspects. Lorraine Hansberry’s writing of this play was not only powerful and moving, but also showed the inside emotion, confusion, injustice, dream(s), and underlying race issues within America at the time. There was so much room for growth and perseverance, but society as a whole held freedom back from those who did nothing but seek that freedom. 

 

Discussion Questions: 

  • Which character’s traits were altered mostly for you after watching the film? Why do you think this character’s description, attitude, etc. changed after watching the film?
  • Why do you believe we gather information differently when compared to reading and/or watching something?

Introduction

Hi my name is Grace, I am a freshman in my second semester and my major is criminology. My favorite color is blue and in my free time I enjoy playing soccer and spending time with friends and family.

css.php