Event Review: The Sherlock Holmes You Never Knew: Black American Adaptations, Then and Now

I decided to attend The Sherlock Holmes You Never Knew: Black American Adaptations, Then and Now given by Provost Ann McClellan. This event was held on the evening of February 29th in a room upstairs in Old Main. I wanted to attend this event simply because it sounded incredibly interesting to me. Growing up, I had heard of the book and movie character named Sherlock Holmes, but I had never read any of the books or watched any of the movies. The name was just such a part of pop-culture and so I was curious. My conception however was that Sherlock Holmes was a white, British, private eye. However, I would soon learn from this event that that was not necessarily the case.

One of the most interesting facts to me was that Sherlock Holmes is the most portrayed fictional character ever. When I heard that I was more than a bit surprised, especially given that there are so many other famous, fictional characters (Batman, James Bond, Superman, and maybe even Spiderman). I also doubted whether many people in the States are huge fans of him and whether the character is even relevant these days. Sherlock Holmes is always portrayed as a white man in most movies, TV, and comics. The fanbase is also predominately a white, male fanbase. In this fanbase though there exists an elite group of Sherlock fans who are called the Baker Street Irregulars. This group consisted of an all-white group until they let their first black member in named Phillip Brogdon in 1988.

The first African American adaptation of Sherlock Holmes was also the first, all-black musical on Broadway in 1903. It featured Bert Williams as Shylock Holmes who was hired as a private detective. Bert, although he was a black man, still acted in blackface. In the musical, there were a lot of references to the original Sherlock Holmes. Then in 1918 one of the first black silent films was entitled “A Black Sherlock Holmes”. This version of Sherlock was portrayed by an actor named Sam Robinson who played Knick Carter. Knick was trying to rescue a kidnapped young girl named Cheza Sneeze. The movie was listed as a comedy. They also used colorblind casting which means they would pick the actor who was the best, not caring what their ethnicity was.  Not everyone was on board with this strategy, especially since he was a historically white character.

Sherlock Holmes turned out to be more embedded in our culture and the media than I think anyone – me included – would ever think. He’s referred to often in jazz music. Bill Cosby even once did a whole bit on his show dressed as Sherlock Holmes. While there are tons of adaptations of Sherlock Holmes stories, there are still surprisingly few black adaptations. There are, however, thousands of fan factions online for Sherlock Holmes. But there are only 15(!!) that are not white fan pages. It is interesting to see how people interpret fictional characters and how it either changes through the years or remain the same. I do wonder if as society becomes more ethnically diverse if fictional characters will do the same. This event certainly made me think about it.

 

“Sula”: In the Grey

When I started reading “Sula” by Toni Morrison, I felt an overwhelming sense of uncertainty, like I didn’t quite know what was going on or how to feel. We are in a world of black and white, and good and evil, but nothing really is black, white or good and bad in life or in this story. It’s a world of grey, where what may seem evil is not really and vice versa. By the end, we see that this tentative, grey-area theme runs throughout the story and is perfectly demonstrated in the chapters 1921 and 1922.

The most striking events in the chapter 1921 center around Eva and her son nicknamed Plum. Eva saves Plum as a baby when he has an impacted bowel. She could not stand to see him in pain and knew that if she didn’t do something to help, the baby would have died. As any mother would, she did whatever she had to do to save her child. Then later on in 1921 chapter, we see a mirror image of this situation play out years later with Plum and his mother Eva. Plum is now back from war, and he is a broken man. He is mentally and physically suffering, and this is no way to live. Eva sees this and once again comes to the rescue, but in a different way. Eva kills her son by setting him on fire. It’s a shocking act that at first glance seems heartless and evil. But it is an act committed because of Eva’s intense love of Plum. She can’t bear to see him suffer and commits an “evil” act for his own good, knowing it will save him from himself. He is a man but he is also her child and as a mother, she needs to help him. We would see it as horrific and bad, but it is in this situation, selfless and completely done out of love and goodness. A quote from “Sula” I think relates to both the scenarios is from when Plum is suffering from the impacted bowel, “She managed to soothe him, but when he took up crying again that night, she resolved it once and for all.” (Morrison 34). This quote relates to both times Eva would help her son and stop his suffering and I believe is almost a precursor for what is to come later in 1921. The line between what is right and what is wrong is blurred and it’s all grey.

In 1922, we see this theme of things not being definitive, black and white again. This time it involves Sula and Nel. Sula represents all things bad; her family is disjointed, unorganized, not the socially acceptable norm. Nel, on the other hand, comes from a stable family that is structured and seen as good.  In an absolutely horrifying scene, they are playing with a neighborhood boy, Chicken Little. Sula and the boy begin to play together, and she is spinning him around in a circle by the hands. He accidentally slips from her grip, falls into the river and drowns. The two girls do nothing. In this scene, both the “good” and “bad” characters take no action to save this child, nor do they own up to the accident. I think this is actually a major significant event in the story that will haunt both characters throughout their lives although at the time, they are emotionless and actionless. They are, in a sense, in the grey zone where there is no action, no emotion, no right and no wrong. And the girl from the good family Nel, did the same as the girl from the “bad” family, Sula. You also see themes of grey area in 1922 with this quote “He dragged the sack away and hooked it over the side, so that the Chicken’s body was half in half out of the water.” (Morrison 64). Again, the theme of that grey area, its not in or out of the water its half in and half out.

The overarching theme of white and black, and good versus evil appears throughout “Sula”. But it is the realization that things really are not just black and white in the world that is most the interesting point. We all have the tendency to identify something as good or bad and not see what lies in between. As children, we are taught good and bad exists. But we are not taught that there is also this grey area. And the older I get, the more I realize that most of life really is lived in this grey area, where the line between what is right and what is wrong is blurred and not so easily discernable. The story “Sula” has a lot of references to black and white and we see them reversed and jumbled (where the best land is at the bottom and the “Bottom” is on the top) and, in the end, nothing is what it seems. But in addition to this inversion throughout the story is the awareness that what one thinks is right and good – the stable family, saving a child’s life – is just as right and good as the unstable family and ending a life out of mercy. And the “good” girl Nel was happy that young Chicken Little drowned whereas the girl from the unstable “bad” home Sula carried that guilt with her for her whole life. There is not always a right and a wrong and most of life lies somewhere in between the two, even linking two opposing sides together and creating this grey, blurred ambiguity that is real life.

Sources:

  • Morrison, Toni. 1st Vintage International ed. New York, Vintage International, 2004.

Discussion Questions:

  1. How would things be different if Sula and Nel had confessed to accidentally dropping Chicken Little in the river? Would they have turned against each other and would Sula have been the one to take the blame because she is from the “bad” family?
  2. What other actions in life can fall in that grey, ambiguous space or do you believe there is always a right and wrong side?

Introduction

Hi, my name is Conor and I’m from Somers, NY. I’m a sports management major. I also just transferred here to Cortland from St. Bonaventure. One thing I’m very passionate about is sports, more specifically basketball.

css.php